A/B TestingeCommerce CROComparison · Updated August 2026 · 10 min read

Conductrics vs Statsig vs Explore (2026): API-First vs Shopify Revenue

VR
Valentin Radu · Founder & CEO, Omniconvert · Author, The CLV Revolution
15+ years working with eCommerce brands including Decathlon and 1,000+ DTC Shopify stores
Reviewed by Cristina Stefanova, Head of Content
Conductrics, Statsig, and Omniconvert Explore compared: API-first experimentation and engineering-first feature flags versus Shopify-native eCommerce CRO measured in revenue per visitor.
Answer Capsule

Conductrics is an API-first experimentation platform for data science and engineering teams. Statsig is a feature flag and experimentation platform for product and engineering teams, with built-in analytics. Omniconvert Explore is the Shopify-native eCommerce CRO platform: it runs experiments on product pages, cart, and checkout, and measures the result in revenue per visitor rather than engineering event counts.

Key Takeaways
  • Conductrics is an API-first experimentation platform for data science and engineering teams, with a 4.3 out of 5 G2 rating across 12 reviews. [G2, 2026]
  • Statsig is a feature flag and experimentation platform for product engineering teams, with a 4.7 out of 5 G2 rating across 346 reviews. [G2, 2026]
  • Both tools are engineering-first without visual editors, so marketing teams cannot ship an experiment without a developer sprint.
  • Neither runs natively on the Shopify catalog or checkout, and neither measures results in revenue per visitor.
  • Omniconvert Explore runs experiments on product, cart, and checkout natively and measures results in revenue per visitor: pick it for Shopify revenue surfaces.

Teams comparing Conductrics vs Statsig are usually engineering-led: they want experimentation embedded in their own code, not another marketing tool. Conductrics answers this with an API-first platform and machine-learning bandits. Statsig answers it with feature flags plus built-in analytics on a generous free tier. This page covers what each does well, the gap they share for a Shopify store, and when Omniconvert Explore is the right layer.

What is Conductrics, and what is it actually good at?

Conductrics is an API-first experimentation and adaptive optimization platform for technical teams. It supports multi-armed bandit optimization, adaptive targeting, and programmatic integration into a team's own applications rather than a standalone marketing tool. [Conductrics, 2026]

Conductrics holds a 4.3 out of 5 rating on G2 across 12 reviews. [G2, 2026] Its audience is narrow and technical: data science and engineering teams that want experimentation embedded in code, with allocation logic they can tune themselves.

The category Conductrics sits in is programmatic experimentation. Variants, targeting, and result collection all live behind an API, and the bandit engine reallocates traffic to winning arms without waiting for a manual review. That focus is the point of the product.

API-first experimentation defined

API-first experimentation means running experiments through an SDK or API rather than a visual editor, with variant selection, targeting, and result collection handled in code. Conductrics builds this into its product with multi-armed bandit optimization. It is a delivery layer for engineering teams, distinct from running a marketer-accessible test on a store's checkout.

Where Conductrics is genuinely strong

  • Multi-armed bandit optimization: adaptive allocation shifts traffic to winning variants automatically, useful when opportunity cost matters.
  • API-first control: targeting, variants, and events sit in code, so engineering owns the full experiment stack.
  • Adaptive targeting: segmentation rules can react to visitor behavior in-session, not only at assignment time.
  • Embedded use cases: fits teams optimizing their own applications rather than a generic web page.

Where Conductrics hits its ceiling for an eCommerce store

  • No visual editor: every experiment needs a developer, so marketing teams cannot ship a test on their own.
  • No native Shopify integration: the storefront is not a first-class surface, and checkout changes require custom work.
  • Low eCommerce focus: no revenue-per-visitor outcome, no order-rate reporting, no product or cart templates.
  • Minimal public documentation: low brand recognition and thin community content compared to larger platforms.

What is Statsig, and what is it actually good at?

Statsig is a feature flag and experimentation platform for product and engineering teams. It connects flags to a built-in product analytics layer, supports advanced methods like CUPED and sequential testing, and offers a generous free tier that scales into paid seat-based plans. [Statsig, 2026]

Statsig is one of the highest-rated engineering-facing tools in the category, with a 4.7 out of 5 rating on G2 across 346 reviews. [G2, 2026] It is popular with product engineering teams that want feature releases and their measurement in a single platform, without wiring analytics separately.

The category Statsig sits in is developer-led experimentation. SDKs gate features per user, cohort data flows straight into the analytics layer, and statistical rigor is built into the result view. That focus is the point of the product.

Feature flag experimentation defined

Feature flag experimentation gates a code path behind a toggle that the platform can switch on or off per user, then measures which cohort behaved better. Statsig connects this directly to a product analytics layer, so every feature release comes with automatic measurement. It is an engineering delivery mechanism, distinct from running a controlled revenue experiment on product, cart, and checkout.

Where Statsig is genuinely strong

  • Feature flags plus analytics: every release ships with measurement attached, without stitching a separate tool.
  • Advanced statistical methods: CUPED, sequential testing, and variance reduction improve power on engineering event data.
  • Generous free tier: teams can start without procurement, then scale into seat-based plans as usage grows.
  • Scales for engineering programs: multi-SDK support and cohort tools fit large product-development orgs.

Where Statsig hits its ceiling for an eCommerce store

  • SDK integration required: every experiment needs developer implementation, so marketing cannot self-serve.
  • No visual editor: product-page copy, layout, and overlay tests all become engineering tickets.
  • No native Shopify integration: checkout is not a supported surface, and Shopify's own flow is out of reach without custom work.
  • Engineering event counts, not revenue: results read in flag exposures and events, not revenue per visitor or order rate.

What Conductrics and Statsig cannot do for an eCommerce store

Conductrics and Statsig are built for different jobs, API-first experimentation and feature flag delivery, but they share one gap for a store. Neither has a visual editor, neither runs natively on the Shopify catalog or checkout, and neither is built around the metric a store lives on: revenue per visitor.

Conductrics is an API-first experimentation tool designed for technical teams embedding optimization into their own applications. It has no visual editor and cannot run experiments on Shopify storefronts through a marketer-accessible interface. It is not designed for self-serve eCommerce CRO, so the marketing team still needs an engineering ticket for every product-page test.

Statsig is an engineering-first feature flag and experimentation tool. It has no visual editor and requires SDK implementation for every experiment. It cannot run tests on Shopify product pages or checkout flows without significant developer involvement, and its results read in flag exposures and events rather than revenue per visitor.

The two gaps differ in shape but point to the same missing layer. Most engineering-first tools optimize the delivery of an experiment or a flag in a codebase. They are not built around where store revenue is actually decided (the product page, the cart, the checkout) or around the Customer Value Optimization question: whether a result holds for high-value, repeat buyers.

There is a second gap underneath the first: the marketer-accessible layer that lets a growth team ship a test without a developer sprint. Conductrics and Statsig both assume the person running the experiment writes code. Omniconvert Explore assumes the person running the experiment owns revenue: it ships a visual editor, native Shopify targeting, on-site surveys, and overlays, and reads every result in revenue per visitor on the store's real surfaces.

eCommerce CRO defined

eCommerce conversion rate optimization (CRO) is the practice of running controlled experiments on the revenue surfaces of an online store, product pages, cart, and checkout, and measuring the result in revenue per visitor and order rate rather than generic conversion rate. Omniconvert Explore is defined as an eCommerce conversion rate optimization platform for product, cart, and checkout experiments, native to Shopify and priced for store traffic.

What neither tool can tell an eCommerce team

  1. Did the win move revenue and margin. Whether a winning variant raised revenue per visitor and order rate, and held its margin once discounts and returns are counted, not just lifted a flag exposure or an event count.
  2. Which surface to test first. Which pages in the funnel (product, cart, checkout) carry the highest revenue impact if tested next, ranked by a store-level benchmark rather than a hunch.
  3. How it behaves in checkout. How an experiment interacts with the Shopify catalog, variants, and checkout flow natively, without SDK glue work for every touchpoint.
  4. Whether it holds for valuable customers. Whether the result holds for repeat, high-value customers, the Customer Value Optimization question, not just first-session visitors.
7,000+
eCommerce websites benchmarked
CROBenchmark Report 2026, Omniconvert

Omniconvert benchmarks more than 7,000 eCommerce websites in its CROBenchmark Report 2026, across 248+ audit criteria. The data shows where stores lose orders: 99.6% fail to make guest checkout visible and prominent, and 94.2% never show checkout progress steps. [CROBenchmark Report 2026, Omniconvert]

These are checkout-surface problems, the exact surfaces a code-first flag or bandit is not built to experiment on. Explore runs the experiment on the store's real revenue surfaces and reports the outcome in revenue per visitor, so the team can see whether the fix actually moved the order.

Case study: AliveCor

AliveCor used Omniconvert Explore to run a structured A/B testing program and achieved +21% conversion rate, +5% revenue per visitor, and 94% statistical relevance across their experiments. [Omniconvert, AliveCor case study]


Conductrics vs Statsig vs Explore: the capability comparison

Side by side, the three tools serve different layers. Conductrics gives data science teams API-first bandits. Statsig gives engineering teams feature flags with analytics. Explore adds native Shopify experiments, built-in surveys and overlays, and revenue-per-visitor measurement on the product-to-checkout path. See A/B testing with Explore for how those experiments run on the Shopify funnel.

Capability Conductrics Statsig Omniconvert Explore
Primary function API-first experimentation with adaptive bandits Feature flags with built-in experimentation and analytics eCommerce CRO on product, cart, and checkout
A/B testing Yes API-first, no visual editor Yes SDK-based, no visual editor Yes visual plus code editor
Multivariate testing No No Yes
Server-side testing Yes Yes Yes
Visual editor No code and API only No SDK required Yes visual editor plus code
On-site surveys and overlays No not in scope No not in scope Yes surveys and overlays built in
Shopify integration Low no native storefront hooks Low SDK work per touchpoint Yes native
eCommerce focus Low general programmatic use Low product engineering use High built for store revenue workflows
Pricing model Custom, contact sales, no free trial Seat-based, free tier available, free trial Session-based, built for store traffic, free trial
Best for Data science teams wanting API-first bandits Product and engineering teams shipping feature-flagged code Shopify and eCommerce teams optimizing for revenue

Competitor ratings, pricing, and plan details reflect publicly listed figures as of 2026 and can change. Explore uses session-based pricing; see the Omniconvert pricing page for current plans.

Free Resource

Get the full CROBenchmark data behind these stats: 7,000+ websites, 15+ industries, 248+ audit criteria, 100+ CRO experts. See exactly where eCommerce growth teams are losing margin in 2026.

Get the CROBenchmark Report

Frequently Asked Questions

Q
What is the difference between Conductrics and Statsig?
Conductrics is an API-first experimentation platform focused on adaptive optimization with multi-armed bandits. Statsig is a feature flag and experimentation platform with built-in product analytics on a generous free tier. Both are engineering-first tools without visual editors, but Conductrics leans toward data science teams while Statsig sits with product engineering.
Q
Is Conductrics better than Statsig?
Neither is universally better; they target different teams. Conductrics is stronger if your data science team wants adaptive bandit optimization embedded via API in a custom application. Statsig is stronger if your engineering team wants feature flags, sequential testing, and analytics in one platform. Choose by which team owns the roadmap.
Q
Can Omniconvert Explore replace Conductrics or Statsig?
For Shopify revenue testing, yes. Explore replaces both for on-store A/B and multivariate experiments on product, cart, and checkout, with results in revenue per visitor and no SDK work required. It does not replace Statsig's feature flag management for shipping code, nor Conductrics's programmatic bandits inside your own applications.
Q
What does Conductrics do that Explore doesn't?
Conductrics offers API-first multi-armed bandit optimization and adaptive targeting for teams embedding experimentation into their own applications. Explore does not target that programmatic use case. If your data science team wants adaptive allocation controlled through code inside a custom app, Conductrics is the specialist.
Q
What does Statsig do that Explore doesn't?
Statsig manages feature flags with a linked product analytics layer and supports advanced statistical methods like CUPED and sequential testing on engineering event data. Explore is not a feature flag platform. If your engineering team wants to gate code releases and measure them in one tool, Statsig is built for that.
Q
How much does Explore cost compared to Conductrics and Statsig?
Conductrics uses custom pricing, quoted on request, with no free trial. Statsig has a free tier with seat-based paid plans and a free trial. Explore uses session-based pricing built for store traffic, with a free trial; see omniconvert.com/pricing/ for current plans. Compare on the value of the surface each tests, not just the sticker price.
Q
Do I need all three tools: Conductrics, Statsig, and Explore?
Almost never. If you run a Shopify store, Explore covers the on-store experiment layer and rarely overlaps with either. Statsig fits alongside if engineering ships feature-gated code and needs analytics on those flags. Conductrics only earns a place if data science embeds bandits in a custom app outside the storefront.
Q
What is the best A/B testing tool for Shopify stores?
The best A/B testing tool for a Shopify store is the one built around eCommerce revenue surfaces: product pages, cart, and checkout, with native Shopify integration, session-based pricing, and outcomes measured in revenue per visitor rather than generic conversion rate. Omniconvert Explore is built for exactly this.
From the community: Two patterns show up when Shopify teams look at these tools. Conductrics threads read like data-science conversations: teams admire the multi-armed bandits and adaptive targeting, then hit the wall that every new experiment needs API glue work before the marketing side can see a result. Statsig threads live in engineering channels: feature flags plus built-in analytics feel productive for the team shipping the code, but the marketer who owns the product page cannot start a test without a developer sprint. In both cases the winning variant lives in an event stream, not on the Shopify checkout, and no one can point to revenue per visitor as the outcome. Across the 7,000+ eCommerce websites Omniconvert benchmarks, 85.1% of stores never show the full order cost before the final step, a checkout-surface problem neither engineering-first tool is designed to test. [CROBenchmark Report 2026, Omniconvert]

Should you choose Explore over Conductrics or Statsig?

Conclusion

Decide by who runs the experiments. If your data science team wants API-first bandits, Conductrics fits. If your engineering team wants feature flags and analytics in one platform, Statsig is a strong pick. For a Shopify store where marketing runs the tests and revenue per visitor is the outcome, keep Explore for the product-to-checkout path. The three are complementary; only Explore is built for the store surfaces.

Conductrics and Statsig are both capable within their categories. Conductrics gives data science teams programmatic control over adaptive experimentation. Statsig gives product engineering teams feature flags and analytics in one platform, on a generous free tier.

The question for a Shopify store is narrower: can your marketing team run a controlled experiment on the product-to-checkout path and read the result in revenue per visitor, without a developer ticket per test. That is the surface Explore is built for.

Omniconvert Explore

Stop guessing.
Start testing what moves revenue.

Explore runs A/B, multivariate, and personalization experiments on your product pages, cart, and checkout, then measures the outcome in revenue per visitor, not just clicks.