eCommerce GrowthAnalytics & Data

Static, Video or Carousel? What eCommerce Brands Launched in October 2026

First published Nov 11, 2026Updated November 13, 20267 min read
Valentin Radu, Founder and CEO of Omniconvert
Valentin Radu
Founder & CEO, Omniconvert · Author, The CLV Revolution
Published: Nov 11, 2026Updated: Nov 13, 2026
Reviewed by Cristina Stefanova, Head of Content
A wooden three-slot letter rack on a dark stone desk, two slots full of small blank ad cards and the third slot empty, a blank paper tag leaning against it, a phone at the desk edge showing one ad card, and four ad cards pinned out of focus on the wall behind.
Quick Answer
3,075 of the 6,858 Meta ads the library first saw in October 2026 were video. Carousel took 2,339 and static took 1,444. If you are planning next month's batch, add one cell in the format you run least beside the one you already run, instead of switching.

Scope: every Meta ad the eCommerceBenchmark Ad Library first saw in October 2026, across every industry and country it tracks: 6,858 ads from 340 brands. A launch is the day the library first saw the ad, and it finds new ads late, so every count here is a floor.

Picture the last new ad your team shipped.

Before anyone wrote a line of copy, somebody picked a shape: a flat image, a video, or a carousel of cards you swipe through. Nothing else gets briefed until that call is made.

In October 2026 the eCommerceBenchmark Ad Library first saw 6,858 Meta ads from 340 brands. Most of them were video: 3,075. Carousel took 2,339. Static took 1,444.

That is what brands made. It is not the mix of every ad running, and it is not a scoreboard. Here is the split, the brands behind each shape, and how many of each were on air when we read the library.

Why you should care, in three lines
  1. Video led the month's launches. 3,075 of the 6,858 new Meta ads the library found in October were video. That is one month, on one platform.
  2. The brand base is wider than the gap looks. 284 brands launched at least one video. 253 launched a static. Carousel came from 250 brands, so video has the widest base.
  3. Most launches were on air when we read it. Video kept 2,545. Carousel kept 1,984. Static kept 1,053. Keeping an ad on is a different decision from launching one.

First, the counts.

Video led October's launches: 3,075 of 6,858

A launch is defined as an ad the library saw for the first time in the month. Format is defined as the content type an ad is delivered as: static, video or carousel. Of the 6,858 Meta ads first seen in October 2026, 3,075 were video. Carousel took 2,339. Static came last, at 1,444.

3,075
video launches
from 284 brands
2,339
carousel launches
from 250 brands
1,444
static launches
from 253 brands

The brand base behind each shape sits closer together than the ad counts do. 284 brands launched at least one video. 253 launched a static. Carousel came from 250 brands. A shape many brands reach for is a habit across the field. A shape a few brands make a lot of is a handful of heavy launchers. Video here is the first kind.

Video
3,075
Carousel
2,339
Static
1,444

Meta ads first seen in October 2026, by format. A launch is the day the library first saw the ad. Source: eCommerceBenchmark Ad Library, 2026.

What this means for your ads. · our reasoning, not measuredThe split tells you what your competitors shipped in October, and that is useful for one thing: knowing which shape a shopper met a lot of this month. It does not tell you which one sold. If next month's plan says "all video from now on", the 3,075 figure is not the reason.

Launching is one thing. Keeping an ad on is another.

How many were on air when we read it

The library was read after October ended, so an ad first seen at the start of the month had weeks more to be switched off than one first seen at the end. Read the three counts below as a floor under each shape, not a race between them.

2,545 of the 3,075 video launches were on air.

1,984 of the 2,339 carousel launches were on air.

1,053 of the 1,444 static launches were on air.

Staying on air says a brand kept paying for an ad, never what it sold.

What this means for your ads. · our reasoning, not measuredA shape whose launches came off sooner is one brands tried and stopped quickly, or one they rotate fast by design, and this cut cannot tell you which. Ask it of your own account instead. Pull your last three months by format and see which shape you retire first. That answer is yours, not the market's.

Here are some of the month's launches, in their own words.

October's launches that ran longest

These are the longest-running of October's launches whose whole creative can be shown, so a carousel appears only where its whole creative can, and a video is shown by its still frame.

cymbiotika.com ran a video that opens "Your wellness routine doesn't need to be complicated, it needs to be consistent", on air 41 days when the library was read. rixo.co.uk ran a static that opens "When the dress code calls", on air the same 41 days. Every launch we can name here sits at that one mark, so read the list as the ceiling this group reached, not an order of merit (that's time on air, not sales).

Steal this: Put the reader somewhere in the first three words, before you name the product. rixo.co.uk opens on a moment, "When the dress code calls". liquiddeath.com opens on a shift starting, "POV: Your second shift starts at 3pm". Write one first line next month that names a situation instead of a category.

So what do you do with this?

Three format tests worth running

  1. One message, two formats, one month. Build the same product message once as a video and once in the format you run least, one cell each, for a full month. Video took 3,075 of October's launches.
  2. A new opening inside the format you already run most. Same product, same offer, a different first line, against your current control. 284 brands launched at least one video in October.
  3. Keep the control on while you test. Do not pause the ad you trust to fund the experiment. 2,545 of October's video launches were on air when the library was read.
Where does your account sit?

The eCommerceBenchmark Ad Library sorts your ads into the same hooks, angles, concepts and offers used in this report and shows your mix next to the market, so you can see which shapes you have never shipped.

Audit my creatives, free

Before you pick one, read the next part. It names the way a launch count usually gets misread.

The mistake: switching every ad to the format everyone launched

Here is how it goes wrong. A buyer reads one month's launch count, treats the biggest number as an instruction, and rebuilds the whole next batch in that one shape. The format that was already carrying the account comes off. Ten new ads go live, and a shopper meets the same look ten times in a week.

A launch count cannot carry that weight. It counts what brands made, never what worked, and no spend or sales figure sits behind it. When enough brands switch in the same month, the next month's count stops describing the market and starts describing the copying.

Your test card

Here is the first test from the box, set up the way a media buyer would run it. Write your own numbers down before you launch.

Your test card. Our template, built on general testing practice. It is not a library finding.
HypothesisThe same message in video will land within my current format's cost per purchase.
Change only thisThe format only: the same ad delivered as a video instead of the shape I run now.
Keep the sameProduct, offer, opening line, audience, placement and budget split.
Funnel stageSay first whether this ad is for prospecting (cold) or retargeting (warm). A deal in the first line is often right for warm audiences and wrong for cold ones, so test it where the ad will really run.
SetupOne control and one variant, same audience, same placement, even budget split. Do not edit either ad while the test runs.
How long and how muchUntil each version has about 50 purchases, or two full weeks, whichever comes later. This is general testing practice (Meta's own learning-phase guideline is about 50 results per ad set per week), not a library finding.
Success metricCost per purchase, not clicks.
Stop rulePause a variant that has spent about 3 times your target cost per purchase with no purchase. If it is close, keep it running.
What counts as a winThe variant beats the control on the metric by an amount you would act on, and still does in a second week.

Key takeaways

  • Video led October's launches: 3,075 of the 6,858 Meta ads the library first saw in the month [eCommerceBenchmark Ad Library, 2026].
  • Carousel took 2,339 of them. Static took 1,444.
  • 284 brands launched a video. 253 launched a static. Carousel came from 250 brands.
  • On air when we read it: 2,545 video launches. Carousel kept 1,984. Static kept 1,053.
  • The longest-running launch we can show is cymbiotika.com's video, on air 41 days. That is time on air, not sales.
  • Test one format beside the one you run; don't switch.

Questions

1What counts as a launch in this report?
A launch is defined as an ad the eCommerceBenchmark Ad Library saw for the first time in the month. October 2026 gave 6,858 of them from 340 brands [eCommerceBenchmark Ad Library, 2026]. The library finds new ads days or weeks after they go live, so the month's count is a floor.
2Which ad format did eCommerce brands launch most in October 2026?
Video, with 3,075 of the month's Meta launches. Carousel took 2,339. Static took 1,444.
3How many brands launched video, static and carousel ads?
284 brands launched at least one video in October 2026. 253 launched a static. Carousel came from 250 brands, so the three lanes rest on a similar brand base.
4Does launching more video ads mean video works better?
No. This data counts what brands made, never what sold: there is no spend, revenue or profit anywhere in it, so 3,075 video launches says nothing about which format earns more.
5Should I switch my next ads to video?
No: run one video cell against the control you already trust. 2,545 of October's video launches were on air when the library was read, and that only says brands kept paying for them.
The One Format Cell to Add Before Your Next Batch

Open your last ten ads and sort them into three boxes: static, video, carousel. One box is probably empty, or close to it. That is the cell to add next month, at one cell's worth of budget, beside the ad you already trust. Video took 3,075 of October's 6,858 launches, and carousel took 2,339, so whichever box is empty in your account, plenty of other brands are filling it. What none of those counts can tell you is what any of them sold. Your own test can.

About this data. 6,858 Meta ads first seen in October 2026, Every industry and country the library tracks, Meta only, from 340 launching brands, October 2026, read after the month ended. Source: eCommerceBenchmark Ad Library. On-air counts were read after October ended, so an ad first seen early had longer to be switched off than a late one. Meta only, so Google ads are not counted here. The library finds new ads late, so every launch count here is a floor. These count what brands made: no spend, sales or profit data sits behind them. The “what this means” notes are Omniconvert's own reasoning, not library findings. The library re-measures past months as it labels more ads and updates the stores it tracks, so a month's figures can differ from one of our editions to the next, and the newest edition has the current read.
Valentin Radu, Founder and CEO of Omniconvert
Founder & CEO, Omniconvert
Valentin Radu is the founder and CEO of Omniconvert. He is an entrepreneur, data-driven marketer, CRO expert, CVO evangelist, international speaker, father, husband, and pet guardian. Valentin is also an Instructor at the Customer Value Optimization (CVO) Academy, an educational project that aims to help companies understand and improve Customer Lifetime Value.
You have seen the market. Now see your gap.
Of your last ten ads, how many are video, how many carousel, and how many static?